High court claimant was fed answers through his smart glasses, judge finds
High court claimant was fed answers through his smart glasses, judge finds
In conclusion she rejected Jakštys’s evidence “in its entirety” and found for the defendants.
Given this was a high court case, that will not be cheap.
Sure, but losing a case isn’t a punishment for wrongdoing during the hearings.
A real punishment would have been getting detained and having to pay a large fine
Since he obeyed the judge’s orders it may have been difficult to prove contempt.
Courts also seem to take the view that a right to a fair trial includes the right to fuck up your own trial.
I imagine the solicitor coaching him via the glasses will be getting a lengthy complaint to the SRA, which could see him struck off.