A reminder that the past is a fun diversion at best, and not a solution to anything. Swapping out your phone for iPods and digicams is a vintage hobby, not the basis of a realistic political worldview.
A reminder that the past is a fun diversion at best, and not a solution to anything. Swapping out your phone for iPods and digicams is a vintage hobby, not the basis of a realistic political worldview.
@nocturne This doesn't really work for me because "exchanging Spotify for an iPod is to me something more akin to deciding to live in the woods", while honest, isn't a real argument.
There is no argument being made here other than "social suicide", which, I don't care. So what? Your parents don't need access to you on WhatsApp, that's ridiculous.
The thing is, streaming services like Netflix and Spotify weren't "the future", they were just a tech-bro libertarian bullshit project. And if you remember, we were pointing all this out 10 years ago, this isn't a new observation.
The trouble with the internet sometimes is that every drooling yahoo now has a whole box of academic sounding terminology to throw at people whenever they're in a rage.
And this is what "The Rise of the Techno-Pastoral" sounds like to me, another one of those hysterical moral panics though which to find increasing ways to overreact to someone expressing a contrarian viewpoint, over something that doesn't matter.
There are no Techno-Pastoral's, I just download music and lurk on the Deltarune forums sometimes. This is a normal thing to do online.
There has never been a time when we were living in a purely "modern society", there's always been a mix of the old and the new. I don't speak for anyone else, but for me, life growing up was more akin to something like Napoleon Dynamite, which could've taken place in any time period.
@EatingHawaiianP1zza I disagree, there are distinct issues with people using their own pasts as a way to frame today's issues that are adjacent with technology.
I don't think ditching Spotify for an iPod is inherently being pastoral and I don't think the author is arguing that. The issue is in the projection that people can make and how they frame it.
For instance, I have a local music collection, but that choice is a function of personal preferences and circumstances, it's not because I'm pining for the time of my iPod Shuffle when I was 13, and I'm not telling anyone that my ideal should be their ideal.
This does matter - I see techno-pastoralism in governments working to upend a free and open internet, and I've seen it to my personal own detriment as a former art student in the 2010's, who had to constantly fight with teachers to use digital tools with dignity and without getting worse marks because they explicitly had a pastoral ideal and they were trying to put it on me.