Happy Pi Day 🥧
And Happy Birthday to Albert Einstein.

Here are a few mathematical representations of π developed over the ages. Can you identify the mathematicians behind these equations?

Pi (π) is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. It is an irrational, transcendental number; its decimal digits continue infinitely without repeating.

π = 3.1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi_Day
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi
#PiDay2026 #PiDay
1/n

NASA uses a value of π = 3.141592653589793 with 15 decimal digits for interplanetary navigation.

Calculating the circumference of the circle with radius = 32 billion km, slightly larger than the distance of the Voyager 1 spacecraft, and π with 15 digits, gives an error of just 1.5 cm.

Calculating the circumference of the Universe with radius = 46 billion light years, with an accuracy equal to the diameter of a hydrogen atom, requires 37 decimal digits.
🔭
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/news/how-many-decimals-of-pi-do-we-really-need/
#PiDay
2/n

This remarkable equation for π by Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan, developed around 1910-1914, is an infinite series with some curious numbers and an interesting property. The first k terms of the sum give π with ~8*k decimal digits.

E.g., the 1st term gives π = 3.141592 73001..., which is accurate to 6 decimal places.

Using 2 terms, we get π = 3.141592 653589793 87808..., which is accurate to 15 decimal places.

https://www.piday.org/million/
#PiDay2026 #PiDay
3/n

Over 75 years after Ramanujan developed the equation for π, the Chudnovsky brothers published this formula, which produces about 14 digits of π per term, more than 2x that of Ramanujan's formula.

There's some sorcery in these numbers.
🪄
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chudnovsky_brothers
#PiDay2026 #PiDay
4/n

@AkaSci The seventh equation was found in 1995.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailey%E2%80%93Borwein%E2%80%93Plouffe_formula

BTW it occurs twice in your list. If it is in time-of-discovery order, the last one is the proper one.

BTW2 the first equation (Euler?) is just pretty. You cannot compute with it...

Bailey–Borwein–Plouffe formula - Wikipedia

@martinvermeer
Thanks! I replaced one of the duplicates with Bellard's formula.