Lol, they want Clinton to be as dirty as Trump so badly.
lol, libs want to cling to the idea that their oligarchs are the good ones so badly
There is a world of room between “good” and “ran a child sex trafficking ring”. Clinton may be a POS for many reasons and he may have visited Epstine island and maybe even raped children (we don’t know at this point but anyone in the flight logs is sus). That is all absolutely terrible but it’s still very different than kidnapping 10’s or hundreds of children to rape and pimp. And the files seem to indicate that Trump was actively involved in this scheme for decades.
Seems to me that once you reach raping children stages there’s no need to split hairs further.

There’s no evidence he did anything inappropriate with kids.

Trump, however, has been accused by multiple Epstein victims.

"There’s no evidence this longtime Epstein associate who flee multiple times on a plane called the Lolita Express did anything inappropriate with kids:

Well?

You’re implying that there is.

So where is it? You’re setting expectations extremely high for yourself.

Gonna need that evidence.

You know things are going well for your nazi rapist of choice when you’re reduced to saying “Well can you prove that he was doing the things that everyone around him was also doing?”
Ok but you’re calling him a wealthy rapist and not providing evidence that your claim is correct. You’re the one acting in bad faith.