So wait… You guys want him to continue to contribute his code to AI without leveraging the tools being trained off of it?

I don’t follow this logic. “If others use your code via ai, then it’s not fair if you don’t get to use theirs”…?

I don’t see how reciprocating in this way has the slightest thing to do with opposing the use of ai. People who oppose its use do so on the grounds that they think it produces worse code.

… Aren’t open source projects supposed to share? And aren’t AIs mostly trained off of open source code?

See, I think the people in this thread are mostly programmers who realize they’re about to lose their jobs. Personally, I don’t really care. I have real world objectives that need to be accomplished so I’m going to keep paying my API fees until the local models catch up. Maybe you guys should learn to swing a hammer or something. Lol, what a joke.

Way to turn you being unable to understand a situation into a “burn” against people with actual skills. Gonna guess this is not the only thing today you didn’t understand at all.

I think what you’re not understanding is that nobody is going to pay you 20 times what they pay Claude for a product that’s worse and takes longer. Try not to run up your credit cards too much, it’ll only make things worse for you, lmao. No sympathy for people who can’t grasp reality. Adapt or go broke retards.

It’s pretty obvious you know absolutely nothing about code lol

No developer I’ve ever met is afraid for their job because we’ve all tried these tools and know how limited their use is right now. Vibe coding morons will not be replacing anyone anytime soon, not successfully anyhow.

If you had any intuition whatsoever you’d probably know that this post only exists because the lutris developer was an asshole about it.