My poker face sucks
My poker face sucks
I’ve taken to putting clear tape or a little vaseline on the lense.
Everyone sees me, but the image is imperfect. I just say there’s something wrong with my camera.
I’m slowly making it worse, so they get used to bad/no image.
They ask to inspect it, take the tape off and give it to them. They hand it back, put the tape back on.
Weird, it only happens on my computer…
Very light sandpaper, like 320. Just a couple of passes.
It will make the glass grainy, and there is no real evidence you did anything.
Lol, there have to know there’s a problem, and I’m not telling them.
IT isn’t that proactive - I would know, I’m part of it. We don’t have time for stuff people do report - we’re not going out looking for stuff.
It’s also such a neurotypical thing to (want to) force people to have the camera on.
Some people work better without at times.
I don’t know how to not be this person.
Everybody else is wrong. A meeting is for back and forth communication. If they didn’t want a meeting, they shouldn’t have scheduled a meeting. Just write a memo or something. Everybody has far too many meetings anyways, and you’re an asshole if you waste everybody’s time on extra meetings that aren’t even meetings.
100% agree with this.
If you don’t want feedback, make your shit meeting an email. Otherwise it’s a self-aggrandizement ego soothing cheerleading session.
During our last meeting (where inexplicably 25 people where called to talk), my direct manager had to take a shit. He told my colleague who was sitting opposite of me to excuse him, should he be called while on the toilet (the order was random).
Unsurprisingly, just as he had left, it was his turn. Despite being muted and had no video on, everyone heard me laugh because it was so loud my colleague’s mic picked it up.
Yet, you are forced to work with these kind of people.
Forced is a key word: we are cattle.
I’d call the solution men going their own way, if the Incels didn’t do it first.
It depends on what the meeting is. There are situations where you might not agree with decisions being made, but undermining your superior infront of business partners is not ok.
Those are the kinds of problems you handle privately. Not in a meeting with other people from other companies.
There might be questions asked. And then you need the appropriate head of department to answer it. That’s why they’re there while not being expected to say anything.
I’ve had to implement systems I did not like. Systems I thought were inferior to other methods. But when the decision is made, it’s made. And when asked how we plan to implement it, I answer with the plan and the steps. I don’t undermine us by expressing disapproval in the formal meeting.
It’s called professionalism.
You were probably already committed to it long before the meeting started.
Time for objections and concerns have already passed
I just watched this GQ interview with Sacha Baron Cohen where he says:
In the real world, real people perform like bad actors. Like soap actors.

Yeah where I work some of the managers get really upset if you criticise them even if their ideas are stupid. If you go on Glassdoor look the company up everyone complains about it so it’s pretty bad.
When they have these meetings to “discuss” an idea really what they want to do is just have an audience to announce it to. I always claim to be busy so I never attend these meetings anymore.
every single video conference application I’ve used has these features
they are always self explanatory and easy to use too