that's it!
that's it!
End users aren’t the customer.
I don’t trust small bakers…

They are wrong. This is a contested grammar rule that was based on one persons opinion in the late 1800s.
There are plently of examples where less and fewer are used interchangable.
Personally I disagree. “Fewer” is more verbose than “less,” so it just looks cumbersome to me.
It also irks me a bit, because I know of some of the instances I see are likley based on the above misunderstanding and not taste.
Non-countable? I think some vampires might disagree.
I also thought Thor relevant but I can’t find anything to support that.
To be fair, knowing what the first mass production machines looked like, some families definitely got back only .78 of their baker.
Jk tho, thanks for the correction.
Baking bread has gone from an everyday job employing a significant fraction of the workforce to more of an artistic job that only a few people do. Bakers don’t really compete with mass produced bimbos, instead they offer a premium product for people who are willing to pay more.
I think it’s always like that when technologies get replaced. There are still people offering horse-drawn carriage rides, but it’s a specialty service now instead of a common job. Same with many of the things you find on Etsy.
Jobs being replaced by automation wouldn’t be a bad thing if the benefits were shared with the whole population and there were a social safety net for people whose jobs were eliminated. Unfortunately, the benefits always go to the people at the top. Some theorists have proposed economic systems where there are no people at the top, or where things are shared much more fairly. It’s a sad fact that those systems seem incompatible with human nature as it stands. Country-sized experimentation with anarchism or communism still leads to people at the top who take a lot more than they give. Those systems seem to work fine in small communities where everyone knows each-other. But, not when they are implemented in countries containing millions of people.
The most effective systems right now seem to be mixed socialist / capitalist systems where unions are strong and willing to call major strikes and shut the country down. You still get “haves” and “have nots”, but the “have nots” still get a voice and aren’t completely trampled by the rich.
It’s a sad fact that those systems seem incompatible with human nature as it stands.
Eh, I’d say 20% human nature, 80% propaganda.
I cleaned out my kitchen about a year ago and got rid of the bread machine that had sat, taking up space, unused for close to twenty years in a bottom cabinet.
So, no, AI is not going to take over every job, and the way it’s looking, the current iteration of “AI” isn’t going to take over many jobs at all.
it will, however, create jobs
someone’s gotta clean up all the slop
My neighbor is an independent baker. He makes “regular” bread in various types in addition to pastries.
He closed his retail business during COVID and never reopened it. He reports that it is significantly less hassle to sell directly to local businesses (restaurants, delis, etc.) and their only consumer sales are now made at local farmer’s markets. Your local bakeries only sell pastries because they’re the only things that sell. The reason for this is broadly speaking that individual consumers are whiny and entitled shitheads, and “the grocery store has it cheaper.”
I remember reading about how in Australia we bake dough made in Ireland. As somehow it’s cheaper to mass manufacture shitty dough and ship it across the globe.
I’ll stick to a traditional bakery’s bread over a supermarkets.