Boah, not is only Carlo Rovelli's "White Holes" one of the worst science books I've read, I also constantly have to politely explain to people that his theoretical predictions are not mainstreams and no, white holes are not something observable because there is no process in the universe that we know able to create them.

But mainly I want to sit down with them and explain how obviously manipulative the book is and where it does not do simple homework checking (well known, historical) facts 😩