Indeed. One person died from Fukushima. Four persons died from the dam that burst. The rest died from "other things" (evacuations etc).
Ah ok.
"One worker at the power plant died 4 years later of lung cancer, having been exposed to 74 mSv since the accident. However Geraldine Thomas claimed "there is a vanishingly small chance that this man’s lung cancer was as a result of the radiation he was exposed to".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_nuclear_accident#Fatalities
@meltedcheese @troed @newsguyusa @David
Could you please form a coherent sentence?
... and only you know the real numbers?
Gut feelings aren't facts. Feel free to source your claims with reputable sources.
You are the source for the claim that Tepco rounded up homeless people for cleanup work who later died?
@meltedcheese Why do you repeat the same rumors that have been going on for 15 years?
You know Japan is not a random third world country, the number of deaths, cancers and more is well tracked and documented.
Spoiler alert: the number of cancers among the population that lived around the nuclear plant is now lower than national average because more closely checked and screened (but that doesn't fit certain people's narratives, so they don't bother checking, they prefer remaining vague with some "we're not talking about cancer yet."
Why "yet" exactly? "Yet" was valid 15 years ago, not anymore.
@meltedcheese That's facts talking.
I know many people have trouble with this nowadays, but facts and opinions are not the same thing.
@evan Ok (I don't know him) it's just a weird thing to say and a weird mistake to make. Even more so if you're a journalist.
I wouldn't assume a will to smear a shady Japanese company, but rather anti-nuclear propaganda. These kinds of lies regularly pop up on from Westerners on March 12th, every year.
@evan He did. He still leaves some ambiguity and ignores two prefectures for some reasons, but better than nothing, I guess.