@mttaggart This whole piece feels intensely Christian to me. This is most overt in the final scene, which is essentially an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting (the "addiction recovery" language is even used) where everyone gets together to repent the sin of denying their own sinful humanity. This ties to the piece's fetishization of "[human] imperfection" which is I think pretty illuminating of the author's internal thought process. Why use the word "imperfect" to describe what makes "human art" special, rather than any other descriptor, such as "interesting" (rather, why does "interesting" follow from "imperfect")?
I think the author really accepts more of the Tech Bro's premises than they think. The "resistance" they prescribe wields no financial leverage, coddles its subjects even as it defines them by their flaws ('we are all perfect in God's eyes'), and rests on an invented image of "humanity" that will necessarily not include all humans. What happens when someone talks about something horrible that happened to them, and is shut down because they're "disrupting the vibe"/"making people uncomfortable" (challenging this image of humanity)? What happens when a struggling person would be materially helped by LLM use, but this makes them unethical or dirty in the minds of the community around them? They become just another lost soul, drowning, drifting, no one to look at them.
But it sure is great to pretend that capital doesn't exist for a little while, isn't it? It feels so wonderfully guilty and suffocating to have a ChatGPT cheat day, doesn't it? It sure is great to have somewhere to call back your childhood and your parents, because you don't fucking have anything else, isn't it? That's the real contradiction. That's the real poison. If you make $50k/year and you're imperfect enough in the right ways, at least you can imagine that you're getting into heaven as the sun sinks below the horizon.