Sarah Fackrell
Judge denies motion to seal in a New York #ScheduleA case: Dong Guan Jia Shuan Co. Ltd. v. UsLikeDiy et al, Docket No. 1:25-cv-10228 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2026), ECF 15. I can't see the order so I don't know why. But the now-unsealed complaint alleges infringement of this utility patent:

US11639041B2 - Process for pro...
US11639041B2 - Process for producing anti-gravity balance massage type buffer convection airbag and airbag cushion - Google Patents

Disclosed in the present invention are a process for producing an anti-gravity balance massage type buffer convection airbag and an airbag cushion. The production process comprises the steps of preparing materials, laminating, preparing an upper cushion body, preparing a lower cushion body, laminating the upper cushion body and the lower cushion body, and shaping to obtain a finished product. The production process and the airbag cushion can produce anti-gravity and buffer convection effects while increasing the force area, and have the effects of balance and massage.

Mar 10 at 12:05pmWeb
Show threadSarah FackrellMar 10
The plaintiff alleges that they "conducted a detailed technical analysis of Defendants’ products, which confirms infringement." But they don't show their work. No claim charts. Not much in the way of factual matter.
Show threadSarah FackrellMar 10
The plaintiff also alleges they are entitled to an award of profits under § 289 (they are not).
Show threadSarah FackrellMar 10
#ImproperDisgorgementDemands
Show threadSarah FackrellMar 10
And no, this doesn't appear to be a "mere boilerplate" thing. The plaintiff expressly bases their request for an asset freeze on a characterization of their utility patent as a "design patent."
Show threadSarah FackrellMar 10
They also argue likelihood of success based on the design patent test. Again, this is *not* a design patent.
Show threadSarah FackrellMar 10
Also, I'm not sure what "exhibits" they're referring to here. The only exhibit I see to the complaint is a copy of the patent.