Unpopular opinion and I expect there will be a lot of pushback on it, but what's a good (polite) debate if not enlightening?

Do you know how your washing machine works? (If yes, keep quiet for those who don't.)
If the answer's no, you do know one thing though I suspect. You know that you trust it to wash your clothes because well, that's what it's designed to do.
If you're not a mechanic and yet you drive, you trust that when you do all the right things and push the right buttons, your vehicle is going to move forward and get you to places. If something breaks, do you attempt to tinker with it and fix it? Maybe, but more likely you go to someone who does know.
What's my point then?
AI coding. Humans made a thing that allows non-programmers to have an idea. They can write that idea in great detail and from there, have something returned that they should of course test thoroughly and if they like it, maybe they share it.
The washing machine is similar but not the same. If you put in your powder/detergent and the right colour of clothes and tell it to start, you let it do it's thing. It washes your clothes and hopefully when you're wearing them at an important meeting, they don't suddenly fall apart, because someone beta-tested that machine ahead of you getting it, and made sure that it didn't rip the seems of your clothes silently, deadly, badly.
AI programs need to be tested the same as your expensive machine, probably many aren't. That is a problem, but the underlying idea of AI code itself being dismissed out-of-hand seems an odd one, at least to me.
Maybe because there's more scope for badness, maybe because you only ever hear the results of all the bad things going on. Like Amazon reviews, the majority of what you see are people unhappy with the product. For every unhappy person there's probably a thousand that just get on with it.
Same for AI badness. For every bad experience, there's probably a few hundred situations where someone made a thing, it just works, nobody cares but you'll never know.
Basically I feel that we maybe need to take a step back, review our hate, our personal biases a tiny bit and stop crapping all over people for doing things a different way that isn't *your* way.
Before automatic washing machines we had manual ones that took a lot more effort, and before that, people washing by-hand. They probably felt exactly the same. The cycle (if you'll pardon the pun) repeats throughout the centuries and will continue to do so, likely forever.
New thing comes along, people hate it, old way was better.
New way becomes old way, new thing comes along, people hate it, old way was better.

Shout at me as you wish.
PS. Wasn't written with aI.

@Onj I don't think this is a bad/unpopular opinion at all. Old stuff may be better for older people, and though I do a bit of hobby AIML coding myself, I am having so much fun with recreating old games I played on DOS Pcs in 1984. I haven't shared them because I'm not even sure anyone would care, but for me, they provide so much good entertainment. When i played the ones I now recreated to have audio cues for me, I was dependent on sighted assistance, not that it was a problem, because I had a younger sister that loved playing the games as much as myself...but the feeling of being able to do stuff independently, stuff I would have had to ask help for when I was younger, leads to so much happiness, if happiness is even the right word. Satisfaction, more likely. Yes there are people that do bad things with AI, but every tool can be used positively or negatively. But then computer programming in itself, even before AI could be used positively or negatively. If memory serves right, then the first computer virus was created in 1981. Again, Computer program, tool...Tool can be used beneficially or harmfully. AI is a tool, just like everything else, even electricity is a tool that can do both good bad.
@Sozhami Yep, a good way of looking at it.