FreeBeardMar 9
The lesser known 34th rule of robotics proposed by Isaac Asimov.
Show threadreal_squidsMar 9
Show threadflamingo_pinyata
How would that even work? If a robot is sexually attracted to a human it’s more of a zoophilia, right?
Mar 9 at 12:02pmWeb
Show threadreal_squidsMar 9
Just build a robot that understands consent, easy
Show threadgravitas_deficiencyMar 9
Unfortunately, that may be more difficult than it sounds, because many meatbags struggle with the concept even today.
Show threadlightnsfwMar 9
Copilot certainly isn’t getting it.
Show threadreal_squidsMar 9
Well if a robot is just a computer it’s gonna do exactly what it was programmed to, I bet safewords are a lot easier than with meatbags
Show threadyogurtwrongMar 17

clank clank clank clank

SAFE WORD! SAFE WORD!

Cannot connect to the speech-to-text API endpoint. Please try again later

clank clank clank clank

Show threadB-TR3EMar 9
“Robosexuality”, according to Futurama.
Show threadflamingo_pinyataMar 9
That’s the other way around human -> robot
Show threadJankatarchMar 9
Homosexuality then.
Wait.
Show threadB-TR3EMar 9
“Anthroposexuality” might be the term,. you’re looking for.
Show threadMoffKalastMar 9
"The good book saith, ‘Thou shall not lie down with a human! Nor do it standing up, nor at any angle in between!’ - Preacherbot
Show threadB-TR3EMar 9
One-zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero-zero-zero-one-zero-one-one-one-one-zero-one-zero-zero-zero–zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero
Show threadnymnympseudonymMar 9
JFC watch your language there are kids on here
Show threadproleMar 10

Ones and zeroes everywhere! And I thought I saw a two!

It was just a dream, Bender. There’s no such thing as two.