"We should have better public transit!"
"Transit, what do you mean?"
"Like… you know… trains"
"Trains? Those machines that kill your entire family in wracking pain with clouds of poison from a realm beyond nightmares? Why do you want more of those?"
"Yeah but not like that"
@glyph I have to disagree with that comparison. Trains can be useful - capitalism cannot.
I'm perfectly serious & I do understand this shit; anything useful that looks like it's thanks to capitalism is actually thanks to commerce, i.e. the market & not only is capitalism fundamentally not the market - it's anti-market.
Well-regulated commerce can be extremely useful & it's therefore important to un-conflate it from capitalism. The latter has to go for the former to work properly.
@glyph This isn't framing or opinion or special pleading - it's fact.
Capitalism = ownership (of the means of value creation).
Commerce = market.
Capitalism = consolidation.
Commerce = trade.
They've been conflated so long most people think it's all the same thing; so did I - but it really, REALLY isn't.
This is also evident in that you can totally have one without the other. Of course capitalism without commerce is robbery & exploitation, but it can happen.