Digital Mark λ ☕️ 🕹 👽Mar 7

Well fucking shit motherfuckers. Vim & Neovim are both contaminated with LLM slop.

I mean, I can just use ed. Or roll back Vim to an old version and never let it update? Fuck.

I do have a new Mac coming, so I could just commit to BBEdit, tho that's less optimal for code editor. Assuming siegel hasn't done something stupid?

Ha ha I could finally switch to emacs with vile binds and then NOTHING will work.

Fucking fuck darkest fucking timeline.
https://hachyderm.io/@AndrewRadev/116175986749599825
#vim #butlerianJihad

Show threadAsta [AMP]Mar 7
@mdhughes @siegel fuuuuuuu

so does anyone know what stance Helix takes on this?

https://helix-editor.com/
Helix

A post-modern modal text editor.

Show threadDigital Mark λ ☕️ 🕹 👽
@aud Helix looks clean, but I wasn't really into their terminal-only setup; when/if they can do GPU-backed windowing I'd be a lot more interested.
Mar 7 at 10:57pmWeb
Show threadAsta [AMP]Mar 7
@mdhughes Thanks. I was looking myself and can't seem to find any evidence of LLM code in it, which, great! I was hoping to find whether they've taken any specific stance on "LLM contributions", but I can't seem to find any evidence on it...

They are apparently uninterested in doing any LLM integrations in the core editor (leaving that up to plugins) itself, but that isn't necessarily the same thing as rejecting LLM generated code. I might ask myself, honestly.
Show threadAsta [AMP]Mar 7
@mdhughes welp, logged into my rarely used GH account to ask: https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/discussions/15408

hopefully that is... calm enough to not invite getting dogpiled by LLM boosters. I really just want a "yes, no, maybe, haven't decided, don't care", one way or another. I am long past the point of wanting to debate this stuff with people...