LisPiMar 7
What scripting languages actually do have proper specs that aren't ignored (therefore no Ruby)?
Show threadhummMar 7
@lispi314 awk
Show threadLisPi
@humm Indeed.

I think it isn't quite suited to generalist scripting but it is nevertheless nice to consider that in its typical role, it will remain replaceable & available.
Mar 7 at 10:01pmWeb
Show threadReid Mar 7
@lispi314 @humm really seems that the tl;dr is that if it's not Scheme or something standardized in POSIX, it's probably implementation-defined
Show threadLisPiMar 7
@reiddragon @humm With some notable exceptions but yes. Not entirely unexpected as I'd given things a cursory look in the past, but now it has become uniquely relevant.