Current Reality
Current Reality
Sabine is one of the most influential scientists today. You haven’t heard of her? She does amazing work and spreads knowledge, new science discoveries, new theories. I mean she did sell out a little bit in the last two years with the ads, but the videos are still brilliant.
She does criticize academia now and then, but I haven’t heard any critique from her that wasn’t completely justified.
But I never heard her say anything remotely what you posted here.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=htb_n7ok9AU
Here’s her “Academia is Communism” video.
posthillpress.com/…/the-war-on-science-thirty-nin…
Here’s where the pull quote she made for the War on Science book is listed.
From assaults on merit-based hiring to the policing of language and replacing well-established, disciplinary scholarship by ideological mantras, current science and scholarship is under threat throughout western institutions. As this group of prominent scholars ranging across many different disciplines and political leanings detail, the very future of free inquiry and scientific progress is at risk. Many who have spoken up against this threat have lost their positions, and a climate of fear has arisen that strikes at the heart of modern education and research. Banding together to finally speak out, this brave and unprecedented group of scholars issues a clarion call for change.
“Higher education isn’t what it used to be. Cancel Culture and DEI have caused many to keep their mouths shut. Not so the authors of this book. This collection of essays tells of threats to open inquiry, free speech, and the scientific process itself. A much-needed book.”
—Sabine Hossenfelder, Physicist and Author of Existential Physics: A Scientist’s Guide to Life’s Biggest Questions
And hey, Richard Dawkins was good at presenting science to people, too. Didn’t mean he wasn’t and isn’t also an asshole with some real stupid ideas like when he proposed we shouldn’t let children read fiction because they may not be able to tell the difference between reality and fantasy.

I don’t need to watch it to understand that conflating academia with communism is fuck-stupid and that privatizing science is a fuck-stupid solution to academia’s very real problems.
Also other folks here are pointing out she rejects science she doesn’t like when it comes to transgender science, for example.
As I said elsewhere, she’s bringing real “you’re not wrong, you’re just an asshole” energy.
she rejects science she doesn’t like when it comes to transgender science
I don’t think so… her content on trans people sounds almost as impartial as it could be, but prove me wrong if you have a better source
I think you should watch her content and draw your own conclusions about her instead of trusting clickbait-y articles or lemmy upvotes
Well for one she’s a physicist, not a biologist or psychologist, and you can find plenty of threads online where people are pointing out that she is cherry picking her data, and seems to pretend that numerous other studies on the subject simply don’t exist.
Also, the person I originally responded to claimed:
She does it for the field is theoretical physics, the field she knows.
Well, shocker, she totally does it for other shit she has no relevant background in, like transgender studies, and feels like she has all the knowledge at her fingertips while conveniently ignoring other research.