A lot of people mention that AI is so expensive that there is no way to make a sustainable business model. AlgorithmWatch points out the strong alignment on surveillance between states and big AI companies, which could provide a way out: states - especially authoritarian ones - could end up paying for AI, as a surveillance apparatus: https://algorithmwatch.org/en/maybe-there-is-no-ai-bubble/ It's a good read.

That's a good segue to advertise the QuitGPT call https://quitgpt.org/, which states exactly the same: OpenAI is supporting dictatorish, and using alternative chatbots will hurt, and possibly bankrupt, them before they can embed themselves too deep into everyday life. See also Rutger Bregman on the same topic: https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-41803922.html

#digitalsovereignty #democracy #digitalrights #digitaldemocracy

Maybe there is no AI bubble - AlgorithmWatch

Despite AI companies’ utter incapacity to generate profits, investors continue to pour capital into data centers. If the financial bubble does not burst, perhaps it is no bubble at all, but classical economics may be ill-suited to explain what is unfolding.

AlgorithmWatch