Nina KalininaMar 5

Please excuse me while I'm having a little existential crisis, lol.

And if that wasn't bad enough, Mozilla has embraced AI (in its code, too), while Linux considers relaxing AI code policy and has some examples of patches co-authored by LLMs.

I am still yet to think hard about what I want to do about it. But the world I knew is no more.

Show thread🌸 lumi-nhac    ðŸŒ±Mar 5
@nina_kali_nina it's ridiculous how slop machines are spreading into everything. we really need a unified resistance against it, not just with programmers, but also with artists, writers, translators, etc

usage of genai should be shamed
Show threadMoses IzumiMar 5
@lumi @nina_kali_nina
May this be a time where the least UNIX-minded tech pundits you've ever seen rapidly pivot toward NetBSD, just for being the first OS to refuse slopmachine code.

(I first heard of their policy through Gamers Nexus)
(I'm just some yokel who likes KDE)
Show threadNina KalininaMar 5
@moses_izumi @lumi nod nod, I've tried *BSD recently after a long pause, maybe I should double down on it, too
Show threadStilic 🇫🇷
@nina_kali_nina @moses_izumi @lumi There's FreeBSD too it seems
https://www.heise.de/en/news/FreeBSD-policy-AI-generated-source-code-No-thanks-10634141.html
FreeBSD policy: AI-generated source code ? No, thanks!

The FreeBSD Core Team has issued a clear rejection of LLM-based source code contributions. It is thus following other open source projects.

heise online
Mar 6 at 6:39amWeb