@nolan I think a coder using an LLM to create a PR needs to be the first reviewer of that PR. If it’s not worth spending my own time to make sure it works, why would I burden my team? My workflow now is to open draft PRs, review, and mark as ready.
@ashfurrow My workflow is also to open a draft PR of pure slop. But then I have 3 different agents (Codex, Claude, Bugbot) review it and vote before I waste my human eyeballs on it. Otherwise you spend too much time finding obvious mistakes, DRYness issues, etc.
@nolan interesting! workflows are changing so quickly, it’s fascinating to see it all. I’ve had good results using Conductor for this kind of adversarial AI review.