This kind of thing is infuriating:

This kind of thing is infuriating:



And, of course, more:



@Angle wellllll, REALLY makes me want to own my own home, so I can actually DO this kinda thing. Man, that would be SO good. I love the hell out of this kind of thing.
(although yes, couldn't agree more with your point about it all. Uggggghhhh)
@Angle yeaaaah, true that.
That said, $50 an and afternoon putting something together? That feels like a very worthwhile use of time/money (since electric etc bills are rapidly rising)
@Angle Ohhh, HOAs are the bloody worst! Sheesh. Ugh.
and yeah, projects like this def require a certain level of spoons (which may or may not be available)
I watched this video and it doesn't really go into *why* he lost his licence, which feels like an oversight at the very least. The description of energy inputs is also extremely misleading - the interior pictures of those houses show fireplaces. It's very normal for off-grid home heating to rely on fireplaces.
It would also be nice to know how this technique compares with straw bale construction. Which is more flammable? Which is better in an earthquake or high winds?
I don't really find it credible that oil companies control the architectural licensing board. There's a lot of extremely sus inference.
The adverts paired with the video were such wildly false bullshit that it does make me suspicious of the entire thing.
@celesteh I think the fireplaces are mostly decorative, or backups required by law but not actually used.
And I think it's less the oil companies, and more the companies that install heating and cooling.
And, which adverts? I had adblock, so I never see advertisements. :/
@celesteh @Angle Honestly, these videos (based on thumbnails and titles) appear to be the bottom-of-the-barrel clickbait nonsense that YouTube is so full of.
I'd rather see a video (or better, an article) talking about the tradeoffs of these various technologies, explaining *why* they're not in more widespread use. Because there's usually a relatively boring "why" for the general case, whether or not it's applicable to a given person's situation.