Iranian warship sunk by the US was sailing home after taking part in an exhibition hosted by India

https://lemmy.world/post/43889544

Iranian warship sunk by the US was sailing home after taking part in an exhibition hosted by India - Lemmy.World

Lemmy

IDK. Kind of sounds like some shit Russia would do. 😒
Well Russia didn’t do it because they don’t have the “fuck you” power that the US has. Russia sucks and is a huge danger, but this is absolutely not the time to whataboutism about them. I really hope you’re being ironic, because otherwise it’s just providing cover for mass murder.
I mean… there can be two murderous ruthless sadistic powers on earth. Three even! I’ll let you choose the third.
And whataboutisms do not help either case. They just muddy the water and derail the conversation. If you want to talk about Russia or China, the US fighting this awful war only helps other competing empires. Russia is more likely to carve further into Europe, China is more guaranteed to take Taiwan, and other countries will race towards nuclear deterrents even harder then they were. Many more people are dead and will die because of this path America has driven us into. It is horrific and America needs to be stopped to make everyone safer.
It’s not whataboutism, it’s condemning both and NOT letting the existence of other justify the actions of one.
That’s not the way it comes across. It was just as annoying when people did the “what about American imperialism!” when Russia first invaded Ukraine. Timing matters
There is no carpet bombing of Tehran. This person is thus not a reputable source and you need to start doubting the rest of the claims until you find a better source.

Are you arguing semantics over the use of “carpet bombing”? Because it was definitely bombed.

apnews.com/…/smoke-rises-after-airstrikes-in-vari…

apnews.com/…/iran-us-israel-missiles-photos-tehra…

Smoke rises after airstrikes in various parts of Iran's capital Tehran

Plumes of smoke were seen rising across various parts of Tehran on Thursday morning as U.S.-Israeli airstrikes continued to pound the Iranian capital.

AP News
Bombed, yes. Carpet bombed, no.
Which means they were targeted, which is somehow so much worse.
They mean striking civilian targets when they say carpet bombing, they don’t mean WW2 style mass dumb bombing.
They mean what they say and it is propaganda. In addition, the amount of civilian targets hit are few. The Islamic regime itself is responsible for a lot more deaths. The opinions of regime-critical Iranians inside the country can be summarized like this: yes, bombs are scary, but the regime is more scary.

Bro two hospitals and a school where they haven’t shown a valid target nearby is three civilian targets too many for the most technologically advanced military in the world.

Double tapping is just fuel on a bonfire but sure if prevaricating for fascists is your deal then carry on.

I just read an article in another post where the school used to be one of seven buildings of a military base

Keyword used to be, we have the largest Intel apparatus of any nation, combine that with Israel being at the very least top ten especially when it comes to Iran.

They knew, stop trying to make excuses for the inexcusable.

I still don’t think they knew, or at least mistakes were made. I don’t see any reason to stike like 500 military targets and then just that particular school.

People give the US too much credit

So you’re under the impression we know how to find their nuclear program, is exact storage locations, the defenses in place, how much rock and concrete it’s under but somehow some way can’t use a telephone book to find out it’s a girl’s school or use satellite photography to see school children going in and out on a daily basis?

Really that makes more sense to you then people taking part in a self proclaimed holy war striking civilian targets?

Yeah, I do indeed think intel on that other stuff you mentioned might get more attention

How do you explain that out of, say, 5000 schools, they attacked just the one?

I don’t need to explain that, no school should be targeted.

How do you explain the fact they double tapped it if it were in fact mistaken?

You’re trying to misrepresent the question

If saying that this wasn’t an error, how do you explain them hitting (almost) no schools and (almost) exclusively military targets? Why would they add just the one school?

We’ve gone over this, they say it’s a holy war. How do you get war powers? You piss off Iran enough to do some actual damage to us personnel either overseas or here at home.

Why just one? Because one allows you to have sycophants or useful idiots to excuse it as a mistake like for instance what you are doing.

You believe they’ve bombed a singular school so it would be discussed on Lemmy?
No they bombed a school to spur terror attacks throughout the region and especially in the USA. And you really think it’s just lemmy people are talking about it.
Why not two schools then
Iranian warship sunk by the US was sailing home after taking part in an exhibition hosted by India - Lemmy.World

Lemmy

Just to understand your claim: you’re saying Israel and the US are attacking hospitals with precision bombs, not carpet bombs? Not sure which would be better, to be honest.

theguardian.com/…/at-least-dozen-hospital-and-hea…

At least 13 hospitals and health facilities hit during attacks on Iran, WHO says

Global health body investigating reports that four medics are among the 1,230 people killed in Iran since start of war

The Guardian

you’re saying Israel and the US are attacking hospitals with precision bombs, not carpet bombs?

This has been Israel’s M.O. for literal decades.

Lot of gymnastics here. This is pretty simple: do not move your unarmed warship through international waters so you can arm it and join an active conflict while your aggressor is literally right next to you.

The Iranian admiral who ordered this ship to sail is an idiot and this ship was fair game.

Fucking wild takes in these comments…

Every statement of this tweet is factually false.

The US did and does horrible things, but the attack of this ship was legal: uwa.edu.au/…/us-sank-an-iranian-warship-and-didnt…

It was a cruel and cynical attack, but it adhered to the rules of warfare.

This doesn’t change that Trump is a monster and this war is horrible, but this torpedo attack itself was legal.

US sank an Iranian warship and didn't rescue survivors. Is this legal in war?

The law of naval warfare sets out permissions and protections for combatants, civilians and neutral actors engaged in conflict at sea.

So, do you mean that the US wasn’t invited in the Naval exercise?
Where in the tweet did he even type the word “illegal”?
It’s weird how the US is turning into everything it fought against. Was fun while it lasted.
Did we fight against it or did we hide our war crimes better?
Can we stop inventing fake shit please? The US has never been a force against evil except for that one time 80 years ago.
This is just the start. The old world broke once russia invaded Ukraine and we did nothing. Now other countries have realized that the world wont do anything if they also attack. Expansion has once again started. I expect Taiwan to be finished by summer too.

I get this vibe that no one knows what’s going on anymore and everything is just running on the fumes of the zeitgeist and conspiracy theories.

I find the fact that the whole world “knows” that China will invade Taiwan in 2027 to be really strange. And this has been the case for years. It feels like certain groups are taking it as a foregone conclusion.

The americans knew the ship was coming for a military exercise without ammunition, they couldn’t just seize it and captured everyone and got the ship? I’m missing something?
You assume they wanted the ship or prisoners more than the death and suffering

Same as where Hitler govt. could have set the claimed non-citizens to do some kind of menial labour but instead they decided to expend resources into stuffing them into smoke boxes for long periods.

There seems to be someone craving the same thing over here and I find it hard to understand why that somebody craves that so much.

First principles: Even assuming they somehow magically knew there really were no smallarms on the ship, why take the risk of getting stabbed or beaten with a pipe or trapping you and starting a fire or whatever. It would be another thing if the ship surrendered, but no reason to put yourself and your fellow soldiers at risk to go easy on your enemy.

Deeper reason: With long range missiles and drones being the primary threat to a ship, the biggest limitations are actually locating the enemy ship, tracking it and guiding the missile/drones towards it. Even a ship with no ammo can do that by relaying your position to another ship or shore based missiles/drones. So pulling your ship right next to an enemy one and having to stay there while your marines go board it is not a safe thing to do.

Capturing a vessel is very different than performing a boarding action. If the U.S. captured the Iranian vessel then there wouldn’t be any risk of “getting beaten with a pipe” because the Iranian vessel surrendered.

Deeper Dumber reason: Given the state of technology today and with all of the jamming, electronic warfare tech, and counter drone and missile stuff that the U.S. Navy has, it wouldn’t make a lick of difference whether the Iranian vessel was right next to a U.S. warship or not.

Edit: lol at getting beaten with a pipe. Jesus fucking Christ. Get off of LLMs, they’re clearly ruining your ability to reason

Putting aside your other bullshit, you answered the question yourself then. They did not capture it because it did not surrender.

In a warfighting context, to capture an enemy vessel or position means you coerced them to surrender with overwhelming firepower or threat of force. Also is semantics the only counterargument you have?

Normally I wouldn’t care this much, but the whole reason for this conversation was that you were defending the murders of unarmed sailors who were not at war. So fuck you, you fucking shitwhistle.

who were not at war

And you accuse me of semantics? Is Russia also not at war in your mind, because they did not make some war declaration ritual?

Normally I wouldn’t care this much, but the whole reason for this conversation was that you were defending the murders of unarmed sailors who were not at war. So fuck you, you fucking shitwhistle.

WTF is this argument? Oh no, they did not have ammo in their gun at the particular moment they were killed. I guess any sniper who kills a general or an assassin trying to kill Hitler should go straight to hell, because their target was not holding a gun at that particular moment.

I find it mind boggling that the part that troubles you is the death of soldiers supporting brutal theocratic dictator most well known for killing his own people and supporting terrorist groups throughout the region. However many issues I have with the US military, the US as a whole, and it’s pedophile president, this really isn’t one of them.

brutal theocratic dictator most well known for killing his own people and supporting terrorist groups

Heheh.

“theocratic dictator” -> “democratic party” idk maybe sth else
“supporting” -> “creating, funding and nationalising”

The rest are pretty much common.
The parts that matter are common.

What do we do? Doesn’t matter who wins, we all lose.

What’s your point? Even if you were right that both sides were evil, should it somehow make me sad they are killing each other?

should it somehow make me sad they are killing each other?

Should I be deciding what your feelings should be?

I have that very album in my CD shelf 5 meters from me - when I bought it I just thought it was a cool Star Wars reference - I didn’t know what quality music I was getting :)