cool guess we need to start the alpine "are upstream projects with LLM contributions legal for us to ingest" conversation
wdym by "ingest" here ?
@fiore @ariadne use code thereof i would believe
so not "include in official repos" ?

CC: @[email protected]
@fiore @ariadne probably

i think the logic would be that llm code cannot be assigned legal authorship and therefore any license permitting the redistribution thereof would be void
@fiore @coolbean that is the concern, yes. and also the possibility of misattributed code recreated by the LLM.
@fiore @coolbean in other words, I am not certain it is legal for us to redistribute harfbuzz 13.0, as an example.
@ariadne @fiore harfbuzz too? god im going back to bitmap fonts fuck this