HotznplotznMar 4

China’s new language law to criminalise advocacy of ethnic minority rights

https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/51761628

China’s new language law to criminalise advocacy of ethnic minority rights - SDF Chatter

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/51758910 [https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/51758910] > Archived [https://web.archive.org/web/20260304044207/https://www.tibetanreview.net/chinas-new-language-law-to-criminalise-advocacy-of-ethnic-minority-rights/] > > In the name of promoting inter-ethnic harmony, China is to force dozens of ethnic minorities within the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to assimilate into Han-dominated society by enacting a landmark law during the upcoming fourth session of the 14th National People’s Congress (NPC) which opens on Mar 5. The law will require ethnic minorities to use Mandarin Chinese as their main language of instruction, overturning decades-old policies that date back to the era of Mao Zedong, noted ft.com [http://ft.com] Mar 3. > > […] > > The sweeping law marks the latest effort in a signature “Sinicization” campaign under Chinese leader Xi Jinping and prescribes legal action against anyone, inside or outside the country, who undermines “national unity” or provokes “separatism”. > > The so-called Han majority accounts for more than 90% of the PRC’s population of 1.4 billion and the country’s constitution recognises 55 ethnic minorities, and a dozen languages — some with their own written scripts — and hundreds of dialects. > > Under the new Law on Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress, while minority languages may still be taught as a second language, groups such as Tibetans, Uyghurs and Mongolians will no longer be entitled to use their native tongues for core subjects in schools and universities, the report noted. > > […] > > The new law “overturns the multicultural promises upon which China was founded”, moving from “an idea of unity through difference or unity through pluralism, to one of unity through sameness, through the elimination of difference”, Benno Weiner, a historian of modern China, Tibet and Inner Asia at Carnegie Mellon University, has said. > > “The conclusion that Xi Jinping and others seem to have come to is that diversity is dangerous.” > > […] > > Worryingly, one clause in the new law is cited as saying only the state has the right to promote “a system of symbols of Chinese civilisation”, which can be used “in public facilities and architectural design, scenic area exhibitions, place naming and public activities”. Such policies, if enforced, meant there was “no way” that non-Han people would be able to safely express “any type of discontent without being accused of being essentially separatists or terrorists,” Weiner has said. > > […]

Show threadBrikoXMar 4

Under the new Law on Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress, while minority languages may still be taught as a second language, groups such as Tibetans, Uyghurs and Mongolians will no longer be entitled to use their native tongues for core subjects in schools and universities, the report noted.

That’s how it should be. That’s already how it works in most (might be all) of Europe.

The law “will expand the legal basis for restricting religious, cultural and political activities among minority groups”, Neil Thomas, fellow on Chinese politics at the Asia Society’s Center for China Analysis. Has said.

That is fucked. Your minority status should never be used to exclude you from exercising all your rights.

Show threaddominic.borceaMar 4

That’s already how it works in most (might be all) of Europe.

What Europe are you talking about??????? Because its definitely not in the Europe I’m in.
Minority people are very much entitled and do use their native language in schools and universities.

Belgium has dutch, french and german as its official langauges, each region teachin in the region’s langauge. Minority language communities have their own full school systems. Finland’s nationa languages are finnish and swedish; swedish-natives have the legal right to FULL education in their native tongue. There’s Swedish-langauge schools all over the country. Spain - basque, catalan, galician. Similar shit. Switzerland - german, french, italian and romansh - all national languages. Even the french, who go crazy about their language shit, still have breton and basque language schools. Romania, hungarians being the largest minority, there’s lots of hungarian-focused schools. German as well. Ukrainian, serbian, slovak, turkish. Uk - welsh, gaelic, and irish. Sweden - sami, finnish, romani and yiddish. Italy - german, french and slovenian.

I could talk all day. Not only is the opposite the reality about Europe, its definitely how it should be and its one of the things that Europe and the EU do right.

Show threadBrikoXMar 4

Belgium has dutch, french and german as its official langauges, each region teachin in the region’s langauge.

Yes, and Brussels have multiple because of their unique governing system. It’s an exception not the rule.

Minority language communities have their own full school systems.

I can’t verify that. There are language schools, but I can’t find any details about full education being available in a minority langauge.

Finland’s nationa languages are finnish and swedish; swedish-natives have the legal right to FULL education in their native tongue.

Again mostly an exception not the rule. Due to their similar language they are mostly bilingual and can relatively easily understand each other. And bilingualism is written in the constitution. Doesn’t extend to other minorities.

Spain - basque, catalan, galician. Similar shit.

Spanish is the only official language in Spain, only autonomous regions are allowed to have their own official languages per the constitution.

Switzerland - german, french, italian and romansh - all national languages.

Forgot about that one and why I said “most”. One of few countries that does allow uncoditional education in multiple languages.

Even the french, who go crazy about their language shit, still have breton and basque language schools.

Only French is an official language and while they allow foreign language schools most of them are bilingual as they still need to learn French to pass exams. No full education in foreign language.

Romania, hungarians being the largest minority, there’s lots of hungarian-focused schools. German as well. Ukrainian, serbian, slovak, turkish.

Another exception and probably the most tolerant country as by law each minority that effectively can generate full classrooms are entitled to mother-tongue education.

Uk - welsh, gaelic, and irish.

Again limited to self-governing regions, England only allows British English.

Sweden - sami, finnish, romani and yiddish.

Sami is only allowed in the Sami administrative area and Finnish have the same status as Swedish in Finland due to language similarities. As far as I know no other language offers full education, but it is technically allowed under the law for recognized minority languages. You still need Swedish to pass exams.

Italy - german, french and slovenian.

Their constitution allows autonomous regions to have co-official language but only German is available for full education as far as I know.

I’ll admit I overstated the situation in Europe as due to past imperialism there are some legacy protections and exceptions, but generally they are targeted and doesn’t apply to all minorities. Out of your examples only 3 have laws that offer universal right in mother-tongue language education.

And China is no different in that respect, as Hong Kong special administrative region allows full education in English.

To correct myself, about half the Europe only allows single national language for full education, while other half have either very limited execptions or full minority language protections in their constitutions. There is a strong push to encourage foreign languages as secondary and in the EU it’s even managed by law that at least one foreign language must be taught as secondary at some point in the education cycle.

Thank you for the comment as it made me do more research and learn some new things.

Show threadmr_manager

You just listed like eight examples of minority languages being protected in Europe. What is the threshold you’re searching for here to prove that minority language and culture are, at least sometimes, treated differently in Europe? I’m in no way suggesting that these issues are being dealt with perfectly anywhere in the world, or that Europe doesn’t have plenty of examples of minority populations being mistreated, but I think it’s kind of strange to argue that China isn’t engaging in some form of ethnic cleansing. Especially when it comes to Tibet and the Uyghur people. The Chinese government is using policies like this to intentionally suppress the culture and language of minority populations.

Both things can be true; Europe has an imperfect record when it comes to treatment of ethnic minorities, and China is targeting certain ethnic minority populations under the guise of “assimilation”.

Mar 4 at 1:20pmWeb
Show threadBrikoXMar 4

<…> I think it’s kind of strange to argue that China isn’t engaging in some form of ethnic cleansing.

Never said that. Not even implied it. I literally said “That is fucked. Your minority status should never be used to exclude you from exercising all your rights.”.

Especially when it comes to Tibet and the Uyghur people. The Chinese government is using policies like this to intentionally suppress the culture and language of minority populations.

It’s well established that China does repress these minorities.

news.un.org/en/story/2022/08/1125932 ohchr.org/…/un-experts-alarmed-reports-forced-lab…

My point was that wanting your population to all be able to speak the same national language is not unreasonable where I directly quoted the article stating that the minority language could still be used as secondary. Replace China with any other country and I would still support that statement.

China responsible for ‘serious human rights violations’ in Xinjiang province: UN human rights report

A long-awaited report by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) into what China refers to as the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) has concluded that “serious human rights violations” against the Uyghur and “other predominantly Muslim communities” have been committed.

UN News