You need to lock in
You need to lock in
“ whoever finds it, can keep it (or make their own perfect version).
I feel like I should know this meme, but don’t. I have 2 main questions:
The device, I‘m referencung here is called a lock-in amplifier. When you try to measure an extremly noisy signal without all the noise, you can use one of these. If you‘re dealing with a DC-signal, you can chop it at the reference frequency.
Here‘s a great write up on the priciples of this technique: zhinst.com/…/zi_whitepaper_principles_of_lock-in_…
But TLDR: After the reference signal is adjusted to have same frequency (and therefore constant phase difference), you get a signal that oscillates with ω_\text{in} - ω_\text{ref} and ω_\text{in} + ω_\text{ref}. Crucially, in the case, where ω_\text{in} = ω_\text{ref} the term becomes constant U(t) = U_0 |e^{i \theta}| while the other terms from other frequency components (Fourier-series) still oscillate. This is where the averaging comes in. An oscillating signal will average (roughly) 0 over a long enough duration. The output is then the amplitude of the desired signal without all the noise.
TBH it’s been more than a decade since I graduated electronics engineering, I really didn’t like filter theory, so I went with embedded electronics for my specialization, and went to work in an entirely different field so…
What’s the purpose of this filter, if all you’re getting out is DC? I mean wouldn’t you want to set the cutoff frequency high enough to actually get a signal through? If all you’re looking for is the DC component, then wouldn’t you be better off (as in a more simple, thus cheaper, solution) just doing a rolling average filter?
Again, I really didn’t follow along in signal processing that well, so I may just be exposing my ignorance here.