I've seen a lot of people talking about the practice of code review in a way that I consider unrealistic lately. So here are my thoughts on what code review is—and isn't—for: https://blog.glyph.im/2026/03/what-is-code-review-for.html
@glyph The second half is exactly why I dismiss any library where author claims tests to be written by an LLM.
That’s not what tests are for. No, you cannot version prompts and expect not even the same but equivalent output all the time.