The same people who rage against authority love moderating communities where their ideology is the only one allowed

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/64603131

The same people who rage against authority love moderating communities where their ideology is the only one allowed - Divisions by zero

Anarchy [https://wiki.dbzer0.com/divisions-by-zero/the-anarchist-code-of-conduct/] is very cool, until someone has the wrong opinion.

All communities have moderation, depending on the desired results.

-Anarchist instances nuke Nazi and Tankie viewpoints because they consider them authoritarian (see db0 and quokk)

-Tankie instances nuke Nazi and Lib viewpoints because we consider them authoritarian (see hexbear and lemmygrad)

-Lib instances nuke Tankie viewpoints because they consider them authoritarian (see .world)

-Nazi instances nuke Tankie viewpoints because they’re nazis (see feddit and piefed)

As a tankie, I take pride that Nazis and Libs nuke my content, and consider it sad that anarchists don’t reflect on why anarchist content doesn’t get nearly as nuked from mainstream capitalism.

Nazi instances nuke Tankie viewpoints because they’re nazis (see feddit and piefed)

Can you tell me what nazi viewpoints are promoted on Piefed please? Be specific.

Sure. I can point you to it: I was threatened with physical violence by a nationalist and I got banned for it.
What gets you banned and doesn't get you banned from [email protected]

Banned from that specific community, or banned from the instance entirely? Because being banned from the instance, which did happen, was not for that reason.
What do you call someone who allows threats of physical violence to communists

Sorry, do you hold the same accusations to lemmy.zip too, as the user is from that instance? Are they also not nazis by your logic?

Also, are you saying anyone who looks past any threat, or inciendary language or violent rhetoric of any kind to someone who is a communist, no matter the communist is automatically a nazi?

If the threat of violence from another user directed at me had happened in a .zip instance and I had gotten banned instead of them, I’d be making the same accusation. It happened on piefed, though, no need for hypotheticals.

If the threat of violence from another user directed at me had happened in a .zip instance and I had gotten banned instead of them, I’d be making the same accusation.

So you don’t apparently expect lemmy.zip to respond to users like that, but you do in piefed.social? What? Because the lemmy.zip user did it on a remote community? Also, how do you know the instance ban and community ban are directly connected?

You can just say “it’s not that bad to threaten violence to communists” or “I disagree with piefed being a Nazi-bar instance” instead of playing rhetorical and asking 12 questions per comment, we’re gonna move on much faster.
I’m pointing out your double standards when judging instances, and your accusation - even if entirely true, doesn’t remotely meet the threshold of being nazi at all.

As the poem goes, “first they came for the communists”

Why did they come for the communists first? And who did?

So anyone who is rude to a communist is automatically a nazi? Is that your genuine position?
Being rude = threat of violence?

As I said: Also, whether or not you characterise it as a threat (I think it’s unsavoury and emotive and violent rhetoric, but not really a threat as such unless you specifically plan to go to Poland or something) - it doesn’t automatically make them or someone a nazi.

And you’re not answering my question: And can you tell me why you don’t also make these same claims to lemmy.zip since the user is from there?

Disengage
That’s up to you, but you’ve made a bunch of assumptions in everything here.