1/n Notes on #UAP Discussions : Methodology is the sieve that separates sightings that are prosaic from #UAP that are genuinely anomalous (and possibly #NHI piloted tech). People often suggest there is a gray zone that new and classified military tech occupies. I’d argue that new military tech, no matter how advanced, would still remain insultingly prosaic compared to what we often see in multi messenger #UAP observables. There are those who insist we’ve reverse engineered these things…
2/n … so it bears repeating that it takes quite a bit of #Physics and #Engineering to get to that place where laypeople might understand the difficulty in duplicating technology that is not a few generations from where we are now but hundreds or thousands. It’s also the case that most of the best talent in the world in #Physics and #Engineering do not reside in classified military / contractor settings where they are silo’d and not even allowed to talk to each other. It’s asinine-
3/n…are there wildcards ? Could #NHI take us by the hand and show us how ? What about all the stories ? No one is talking. There is no data.Just stories and speculation.
We could have a hardware/ materials collection stretching from here to there and still be clueless. We have to make progress on some fundamental open problems in #Physics and #Engineering just to get to the starting line.
Is it worth it ? Yes but…humanity needs to be in a better place then they are now. We will likely progress-
4/n…enough in the next decade to make headway on new propulsion systems. Invariably on the path to that stuff blows up. It might have been an accident…but if it’s a brand new way of blowing stuff up we will weaponize it.That tendency became incommensurate with long term survival on the planet nearly half a century ago. Things have only gotten worse