Julian HamannMar 2

Based on a representative survey of academics at German universities, Christiane Thompson and I find little support for "canceling" controversial views on campus. Instead, universities are widely expected to facilitate debate on controversial issues.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-026-09631-4

Our two main findings:

Show threadJulian HamannMar 2
1) Across disciplines, status groups, and genders, the majority of respondents expect their universities to create a discursive space for controversial issues and what we call "academic citizenship". Academic freedom thus emerges as a collective, institutional practice, not just an individual right.
Show threadJulian Hamann
2) Based on our descriptive analyses, political orientation seems to shape which institutional response academics prefer. Irrespective of the issue(!), left-leaning respondents seem to favor deliberative formats, right-leaning respondents prefer authoritatively responses to controversial issues.
Mar 2 at 10:02amWeb
Show threadJulian HamannMar 2
Perhaps it's important to emphasize that there are different explanations for these political preferences: one is that the political orientations, by definition, imply preferences for either more deliberative or more authoritative approaches to deal with controversial issues.
Show threadJulian HamannMar 2
The other explanation is that right-leaning respondents are in the minority on campus (1,4%) and thus rely less than left-leaning respondents (38,1%) on the deliberative means of academic discourse to resolve controversial issues in their favor.