The difference is by design.
@AssalRad And the difference is by proof and source.
Please do not confuse a terrorist regime with a democracy, even if the democracy is in as poor a state as that of the US or Israel. In the former case, it is impossible to obtain facts that can be trusted. In the latter case, however, it is possible to verify statements.
@ralph @AssalRad
Mais non car justement dans les deux cas on a à faire à des régimes corrompus et atteint par des maladies différentes ...
Peu importe leur étiquette ... Démocratie ? mais de quelle démocratie parlez vous celle qui fait un #genocide? Celle qui tue ses citoyens dans ses rues avec ses milices techno-fasciste ?
Les gardiens de la révolution islamo-fascistes qui tuent des milliers d'opposants.
Pour les victimes on devrait avoir une information la plus juste possible ...
@jipexu @AssalRad But you anyway need to mark information in some way to inform also about how trustworthy and how well checked an information is.
@ralph @AssalRad ‘elected democracy’ and ‘ terrorist regime’ are not mutually exclusive descriptions. Both these elected democracies (and neither are true democracies) can be described as terrorist regimes. They create terrorists through their actions, they use terrorists as political means, and both act outside of international law.
@mativity @AssalRad They are mutually exclusive. The social boundary conditions make them mutual exclusive. Anything else is simply propaganda strengthening autocracy and dictatorship.
@ralph @AssalRad "poor state" is certainly a way to describe "actively engaging in campaigns of genocide and misinformation".
@ralph @AssalRad "the illusion of democracy".