Last night I went to a 70th birthday party and ended up sitting next to Frank.

Frank used to work as a computer programmer, because this was the 1970s to 90s and people had normal job titles that described real things, instead of "full stack orchestration engineer" or "solutions architect".

Anyway Frank's employer was the Victorian Attorney General's department. He wrote, updated and maintained in-house software for managing the court system, trial documentation managements and so on using low level languages.

The point of this post is that there was nothing special about this period of history that made it possible for government departments to write and maintain their own software to solve their own problems then but not now.

The complete lack of any in-house capacity to do this kind of thing is a political choice. Frank is a reminder of that.

@hugh On another continent, my father worked as an on-site consultant for a software firm (later acquired by Lockheed Martin) to help them replace their in-house court management software with the firm's products.

Like with many organizations, there was more custom software written by consultants to implement their "business rules" than the entirety of their old case-management systems.

@hugh (He didn't write the software: he wrote the requirements document based on the client court system's rules, then while the other consultants were implementing that, he wrote the test plan to ensure that they did it right.)