I Mean . . .
I Mean . . .
Holy cow my man. Do you live on here?
Like, not agreeing with the guy, but if you assume that he didn’t respond to you in an hour because he can’t, as opposed to just having a life, that’s a far more negative reflection on you than him.
Most people aren’t on here every waking hour. And if you are, I genuinely recommend you self reflect and maybe step away from the keyboard a bit.
No, but when I say something controversial, I tend to monitor replies for a short while in case anyone responds.
I don’t tend to troll, but I’d expect a troll to monitor even longer, since otherwise what’s the point?
Personally, I find it distasteful to default to “man” when referring to people that you’re unsure of the pronouns of, especially those that are seemingly female presenting. This is an example in choosing your battles, because nitpicking someone detracts from their point. Pettifogging and such.
Furthermore, I think the number of sentences in your reply is entertaining, for someone criticizing another for spending too much time on this app. Also yes I am indeed pettifogging. =^}
Listen my guy, I definitely don’t read all these dude’s usernames when I post.
But while I’m sure being misgendered is upsetting to any hombres I’ve mistakenly done it to, I feel like there’s a difference between misgendering some bro in real life and over a faceless medium like a message board. Or, as I like to call it, a man-ssage board.
… And yeah, I’m overly wordy. It’s just how I post. Stream of consciousness bby!
I was thinking about Obama’s Libya, Afghanistan, ISIS while Clinton was complicit in striking Yugoslavia.
Biden is a lesser match here, but he could be blamed for enabling Israel in 2023
Ps: have you assumed I was getting a healthy piece of sleep?
FYI the user is Russian:
By the standards of the Nuremberg trials, every president since Eisenhower has been a war criminal. Chomsky wrote a piece on this in 1990, giving brief but convincing arguments for every president individually up till then. The pattern hasn’t stopped since then. Bush needs no argument, I hope. Obama has his explicit protection of the torturers of abu ghraib, the expansion of the drone program which killed thousands (including hundreds of civilians), killed an entire wedding. Biden bombed Yemen, Syria, and others, and of course the genocide. Trump, I hope, needs no argument. Terrorist state.
It is a legitimate classification system.
LOL
GenX who lives through the last war with Iran:
The Boomers who lived through the war before that
You were supposed to zoom in more, here:
What does this even mean? The proportion of gen z trump voters was way lower than millennial trump voters in 2024
Regardless these arbitrary generational divisions are worse than meaningless
Generations do have voting habits though, someone from gen Z is not voting for the same reason as the boomers. When people from the younger generation make choices that will hurt their future it should be realized and understood so hopefully later elections (heh for the current system) they can understand why some people aren’t in their best interest and things adjusted.
Mean for voters that want the current situation then they’re assholes cause they voted for someone with the worst outcome of the planet and society in mind.
Generations do have voting habits though
What you mean to say is simply that environment influences behavior. “Generations” are just arbitrary buckets that reinforce stereotypes and create division.
washingtonpost.com/…/generation-labels-mean-nothi…
Please don’t say what I meant to say. If I am incorrect i am is all. I think generations have a valid similarity because of the world at the time.
Mean didn’t say the exact generations as said by books but people who grow up in a similar political and economic environment probably are impacted by that situation and that sort of happens, Which is more what I meant.
I don’t think that’s the case at all. College football is closer to communities in areas that don’t have bigger professional sports teams and is an extremely achievable goal for a lot of folks who want to play ball and go to school.
I would be sold if you told me that Hollywood was conditioned/incentivized to make movies idolizing the Army
Perhaps I misspoke saying “college” football.
I don’t really see how any of those facts you said are mutually exclusive with what I said.
If you think about football as a career, it’s a goldmine of people who didn’t make the cut and can enlist.
If you think about football’s skill development… it very much aligns with military teamwork etc.
Football selects for people who will follow orders, put themselves in harms way, and focus on the objective.
the-cauldron.com/the-nfl-is-one-giant-military-re…