Last night I went to a 70th birthday party and ended up sitting next to Frank.

Frank used to work as a computer programmer, because this was the 1970s to 90s and people had normal job titles that described real things, instead of "full stack orchestration engineer" or "solutions architect".

Anyway Frank's employer was the Victorian Attorney General's department. He wrote, updated and maintained in-house software for managing the court system, trial documentation managements and so on using low level languages.

The point of this post is that there was nothing special about this period of history that made it possible for government departments to write and maintain their own software to solve their own problems then but not now.

The complete lack of any in-house capacity to do this kind of thing is a political choice. Frank is a reminder of that.

@hugh

When I started my career, the running joke was "ManData", a massive HR automation project (for its time) coordinated across multiple government departments, that failed.

Most departments hires a small army of consultants to tweak PeopleSoft, SAP, or whatever to sorta fit their needs. The cost is eye-watering and the results are mediocre. The other huge issue is where there is eye-watering amounts of money being splashed around, there is also eye-watering opportunities for bribery, corruption, and outsourced incompetence.

Computers are still hard. That is why AI wil save us. /s

@adavid @hugh 😅 Comrade! I still have my Mandata pickup stamp we used on the SPR cards to show we had transferred the record to online. I was in Tassy in DVA HR - the smallest branch of the most diverse employment conditions. We had everything working except long service leave for part time shift workers. I was devastated when we were told to close it down. It was such a great vision.