Low estimates are nine million dead and the high estimates are that he killed thirty million of his citizens.

What are you referencing? Even in the most anti communist historical interpretations the vast amount of deaths are usually attributed to Stalin, not Lenin.

If we’re talking about the holodomor… That began in 1932, roughly 8 years after Lenin had already died.

I’m not claiming that there aren’t any valid criticisms of the Russian revolution, however I think attributing all that criticism to Lenin is just historically inaccurate.

We also have to view history within the context of their own time when evaluating things like social morality. Was the Soviet revolution devoid of crimes against humanity, no. But I think it would be hard to argue that it wasn’t a vast improvement compared to the literal tyrannical rule of the Romanov family.

The minute Lenin took power there was a food crisis in Russia and arranged for every scrap of grain taken from Ukraine. A series events unfolded over the coming years that would ultimately lead to the Holodomor under Stalin much later. It’s a long and complex tale that I’m sure some believe is fake news.
The Russian famine of 1921 was largely due to a drought combined with the aftermath of WW1 and the Russian revolution. You could argue that Lenin’s policies didn’t effectively combat the famine, but I think it would be hard to argue that he instigated it. Also, I think you are misremembering the timeline of the soviet’s impact on Ukraine.