That last part is super important. We know this administration is building concentration camps for non-citizens. It’s a logical next step to extend that to citizens and non-citizens alike with ties to the counties he doesnt like. Whose gonna stop him?

Well, if it comes to that Mamdani will try his best to stop him. And since Trump seems to have a man crush on Mamdani, maybe it will work where other interventions haven’t.

In a just world this man would be president.
Why would you wish him such an awful fate?
In a just world we also have a functioning government.
I would be in favor of amending the Constitution to make the qualifications for President “Be a natural-born citizen and at least 35 years old, or be a naturalized citizen for at least 35 years”. Maybe if we pull out of this fascist decline we could get that passed in his lifetime.

My father always used to tell me that the reason we don’t have requirements on academic qualifications for political office is that in a democracy everyone should have the same chance to get to govern and on the merit of their ideas and character, and that placing academic rules on governance would create an unfair advantage for the privileged and only further entrench class divisions.

I thought he had a point but was wrong when he was alive, and I think he has a point and is wrong now that he’s dead. Our society is much too complex for people who have no formal education or the capacity for critical thinking to handle governing hundreds of millions of people at a time.

I feel like he had a point, but I feel like I do, too. I wouldn’t mind seeing some form of aptitude test. I mean jeez, you have to take a test to drive a car, but whichever snake oil salesman can decide to plunge the world into war? I don’t know…

I have always felt that the only arbiter of academic qualifications should be the voters. If someone can make their case to voters directly, the it shouldn’t matter how formally educated they are.

However, this assumes that voters actually determine who gets those seats. More than 90% of House seats are in districts that are drawn to be so safe for one side or the other that the general election is a formality. A politician who can fend off primary challenges can essentially hold on to that seat forever, regardless of qualifications.

That’s why we keep electing dumbasses to Congress. They know how to game the system. How do we fix that? I don’t see any way out as long as parties can game districts like that.

I would just say academia isn’t the only way to attain culture and reasoning skills. I’m not even sure it is a reasonable predictor of those skills based on the degreed idiots I’ve seen lately.
And under the age of 65.

There will never be another amendment to the constitution passed in the present form of our government. It would take a complete collapse of the federal government and a new constitutional convention.

As it stands, there is no way to get 2/3 of the states to agree on anything. You couldn’t even get 2/3 of the senate to agree that the sky is blue.

In a just world he would be put aside as a reactionary. But in the unfair world we have he is plenty steps ahead of what is the norm for his position.
Give it time, he just entered the political scene not that long ago. A few full terms as mayor of NYC, maybe a couple as governor, and then he’ll be ready for a presidential run.
“Illegal war”? Every war must be illegal
Illegal from the standpoint of the USA. I think it is indeed understood the country being attacked will consider it an illigal war. But rarely does the law and constitution of the aggressor’s country deems it illegal. Yet he we are.
He is one of the best politicians for sure.