IMO, in a overhauled America, no person should be able to own more than one company. Every company’s workers vote for who the leadership and their pay is, while retaining voting power for one year after being fired.

No person should own any company unless they are the sole employee. Ownership should be shared with workers in equitable stakes as the company expands.

So a lawyer hires a secretary, they each get 50% of the company. Or are you cool with uneven ownership shares in your model?

Equitable != equal.

However, at the same time, why do you inherently value the lawyer over the secretary? Both do a full weeks work, both are essential to the companies success. You are just attached to consumerism and the idea of hierarchy; that you should be able to be “better than” people you deem as peons. Does the janitor not deserve a fair share either because you will use some bullshit framing like “unskilled labor” to dismiss their essential contributions?

Do you know of many law firms that only consist of secretaries?

You are just attached to consumerism and the idea of hierarchy; that you should be able to be “better than” people you deem as peons. Does the janitor not deserve a fair share either because you will use some bullshit framing like “unskilled labor” to dismiss their essential contributions?

You can fuck off with this.