Could you give me a source for this?

Preferably a Finnish one. Not by language (although am Finnish so not an issue) but like a reliable source in Finland documenting that’s what they’re for?

I know we do have lots of infra designed “in case of Russian attack”, mainly the direction of roads on the eastern border, but I’d like to read up on this blowing bridges shit.

I’m not sure if this is something you’ll find an official source for as FDF isn’t known for openly sharing information regarding national defence.

However, you can find plenty of discussion for it online and for example on this video it’s mentioned around the 1:25 mark.

Yeah but I don’t see those hooks as being related. You don’t really need hooks like that to blow a bridge and that’s a small underpass of a regular road. You could cave that with a few sticks of TNT. And drilling them into the wall is much more efficient than hanging them off the wall.

I just suspect these hooks are just remnants of building it, and not for any specific purpose. Don’t really care if I’m wrong but I won’t be dissuaded unless someone actually proves it properly.

And drilling them into the wall is much more efficient than hanging them off the wall.

You cannot do this for a tactical retreat, which these kinds of slowing tactics require, they need to divert armored columns within minutes of the advances. I don’t have a source on if that’s what the hooks are specifically for, but I can think of nothing else that would aid a rapid demo more, that wouldn’t also be prone to problems.

Two soldiers with charges they taped or roped together ahead of time can throw them in line across the hooks in under a minute and get out. KISS.

but I can think of nothing else that would aid a rapid demo more, that wouldn’t also be prone to problems

Literally drilled holes? I googled this a bit and they call them “charge pits”. I find it weird they’d call them “pits” if they’re just rebar they hang explosives off of.

You don’t decide to blow a bridge willy-nilly, and they need to have explosives anyway, and since the bridges are blown in advance, I don’t think they’d be in the middle of a tactical retreat.

Blowing up bridges with methods you decide during peacetime is strategy, not tactics.

I don’t have the energy to try to take this hill from someone who has watched too many movies, you get to live this day.

I’m a supply core undersergeant, so I literally went through lists of military equipment when I was serving. Never saw anything related to using antitank mines for improvisational demolition charges.

Just admit you don’t have any reason. You can’t rationalise it, but despite the overwhelming lack of evidence and logic, you still believe it. This is why Finland (or rather Finns) suck.

You are deeply, deeply repulsive to try to chat with, I hope you have friends in real life.