He'll arrest you with his nippies ❤️🔥
https://piefed.social/c/lemmyshitpost/p/1827021/he-ll-arrest-you-with-his-nippies
He'll arrest you with his nippies ❤️🔥
https://piefed.social/c/lemmyshitpost/p/1827021/he-ll-arrest-you-with-his-nippies
Highest grossing films of 2000 tend to disagree:
Given this, I would say the coolest outfits would either involve plate armor, a volleyball, or a green yak-fur suit.
It’s probably my favorite movie on that list, but only because I can enjoy it with my kids.
A few more years and then, maybe I can bring them into the JasonDJ “circle of trust”.
Making money != being cool.
If your sense of style is dictated by what is profitable, your style is consumerism.
“Cool” is subjective. But if you’re looking at a population, you need to look at what is most popular to determine what people think is “cool”.
Mass approval means mass acceptance. Mass acceptance means mass cool.
I can’t think of a better measure for what the majority of people like and think is cool, than cinema gross revenue. Because most walks of life enjoy the movies. Hollywood knows movie-goers vote with their wallets, or at least they knew that in 2000.
Hipsters weren’t gonna be cool for nearly a decade.
Iron Man wouldn’t come out till 2008, roughly the time the universe splintered and we got stuck in Timeline B. That was basically the beginning of the end of anything making sense. Now everything’s a reboot, a sequel, a sequel to a reboot, or a reboot of a sequel.
They are highest grossing because they sold the most tickets.
Uncool movies don’t sell the most seats.
It’s literally a popularity contest. And popularity contests are always given to the coolest.
What Women Want
$33.6 million opening weekend
X-Men
$57.5 million opening weekend
Nice. So, I think we can conclude that X-Men is more romantic than What Women Want. That’s cool, I guess.
You answered the question by saying ‘because it is’.
No, its not.
Yes, ‘cool’ is subjective.
Popular and cool are not the same thing.
Many of the movies with a cult following now were basically commercial disappointments or even failures.
Art doesn’t exist purely to make money.
That’s ‘content’ you’re thinking of.
Nah, this ain’t it.
“Cool” is nebulous and ephemeral, and defined by being difficult to pull off, IMO. The majority of cool things and people tend to burn bright and quick. It’s also very relative in a social sense. (What’s considered cool in rural Nebraska is definitely not cool in LA, at least not at the same time.)
Being the right person (or social group) in the right place at the right time, being of another time (including future) or just having a particularly unique sensibility can all be factors. Once something cool becomes widely popular it tends toward commodification and watering down, and that is the opposite of cool.

need to have been there to see it for yourself.
This symbol: @ used to be the coolest shit ever, they put it even on biscuit packages.
No this was: