@AccordionBruce @catsalad @Tattooed_Mummy @emojipedia @katemorley i know, but them conflating country flags and pride flags is extremely questionable, and the justification is complete bullshit which comes across as telling an already very vulnerable group of people to fuck off:
Identities are fluid and unstoppable which makes mapping them to a formal unchanging universal character set incompatible.
Like what? They are being asked to add very specific symbols, and this is their reply?
Like - languages are also fluid and unstoppable, didn't seem to have been a problem.Hearts are among the most frequently used type of emoji and the nine colored hearts are often juxtaposed next to each other to denote markers of emotion (โIโm sorry ๐โ or โlove you โค๏ธโ) and identity or affiliation that are not represented with atomic emoji in the Unicode Standard (ex. โPan African pride โค๏ธ๏ธ๐๐คโ, โHi Iโm bi ๐๐๐โ, and yes even sports teams โGo Mets! ๐๐งกโ ).
Ah yeah. I'm sure screen reader users will appreciate "Pan African Pride red heart emoji green heart emoji black heart emoji" and "Hi I'm bi sparkling heart emoji blue heart emoji purple heart emoji". Like that sounds like sth from a matt rose video, but this is quite literally how it would be read out here.
So - that doesn't hold water for even a moment. So no, this is unicode consortium telling queers and screen reader users to fuck off. After all, in a couple years we'll likely be all murdered by people metaphorically carrying ๐บ๐ธ flags, or ๐ท๐บ, or even ๐ฌ๐ง (wait no, it would be ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ), or maybe even U+5350 (not gonna type it out, feel free to paste it into a character map of your choice) and stop asking without unicode consortium having to do anything, right? ๐