@hdv I'm conflicted on this one. On one hand, I think transparency is important. On the other hand, if someone chooses to use AI to assist them, I don't think the standards of accountability or code review should be any different. The person submitting it is ultimately still fully accountable and responsible for the patch, and the reviewer should apply the same rigor as they always do. I could see a world where attributing AI has the opposite effect: a (very) misguided reviewer assumes it is more likely to be correct *because* AI is involved. @pikesley

@jcsteh @hdv @pikesley yeah, that's the intent of this change (I responded on the thread). It's not that AI code should be hidden, it's that AI cannot own a contribution. A human must own contributions to Firefox.