AIs can’t stop recommending nuclear strikes in war game simulations

https://sh.itjust.works/post/55893471

AIs can’t stop recommending nuclear strikes in war game simulations - sh.itjust.works

Lemmy

The atrocities at Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been hand-waved extensively in writing — the same writing that AI is trained on. So naturally, AI will recommend the atrocity that has been justified by “instantly winning the war” and “saving millions of lives.”

hand-waved

I think you mean white-washed, misrepresented, and celebrated.

Ayo do me a favor and chart the long term health effects of being vaporized by a nuclear bomb at hiroshima vs years of agent orange/abandoned minefields/ abandoned chemical and munitions storage somewhere like Vietnam circa 1970.

Please show how the nukes are worse.

Eight decades of research on the long-term health effects of radiation in atomic bomb survivors and their offspring

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41144264/

Long-term Radiation-Related Health Effects in a Unique Human Population: Lessons Learned from the Atomic Bomb Survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

cambridge.org/…/61689AD5A1AA4A684B84DFA4F9E5D1D3

Health Impacts of Hiroshima Bombing

large.stanford.edu/courses/2024/ph241/bennett1/

Long-term Health Consequences of Nuclear Weapons
70 Years on Red Cross Hospitals still treat Thousands of Atomic Bomb Survivors

icrc.org/…/hiroshima-nagasaki-health-consequences…

Eight decades of research on the long-term health effects of radiation in atomic bomb survivors and their offspring - PubMed

This year marks the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Over the past eight decades, large-scale cohort studies of atomic bomb survivors and their offspring conducted by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation and its predecessor, the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission, …

PubMed

Unfortunately I’m going to have to grade you as an F on this project. You have only completed half the assignment. Great job cherrypucking your research though! I see a bright future in business and marketing for you!

5/10

And your sources are? Where? Your ass?

My source is my own post where I asked for a comparison between the health effects of the bombing of Hiroshima vs the contamination of half of a Vietnam war. The answer i reviewed only explored the health effects of the hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. That’s half of the assignment. Less, actually, when you consider the comparison between the two was the entire point to begin with.

Did that answer your question or should I try again with a crayon diagram?

You can also look it up. It’s not anyone’s job to compare things for you.
Now tell that to your high-school English teacher when they assign you a research project.
You aren’t they.