There's No "Progressive Foreign Policy" Without a Reckoning for Dems Who Supported Genocide

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/64444464

There's No "Progressive Foreign Policy" Without a Reckoning for Dems Who Supported Genocide - Divisions by zero

>Progressives acknowledging the fact of genocide is a good first step, and it’s useful that Ocasio-Cortez and others have done so — “I think [unconditional aid to Israel] enabled a genocide in Gaza,” she said in Munich — but it is not in and of itself sufficient. Before anyone in the party can move on to selling a post-Biden vision of human-rights-first foreign policy, they must address what accountability for the war criminals in the Biden administration — those who aided, armed, and funded genocide — should look like.

Come mid-terms I’m going to proudly vote democrat everywhere I can so hopefully we can get some control of the country again.

Bingo.

I’ll think about Palestine after my country stops being run by actual fascists and Americans stop being executed in the street and our Constitutional rights stop being violated on a daily basis.

And, coincidentally, by voting Democrat, I am doing the most beneficial thing I can for Palestine because THERE ARE NO VIABLE THIRD PARTIES IN THE UNITED STATES.

What state was going to flip to Harris if ALL of those green party voters flipped Democrat? You can’t name one, because there isn’t one.

Reactionary centrists got Trump elected. Period.

@[email protected] you can't just look at Green party voters because some people very likely also stayed home instead of voting for the same reason. If you could also count those it's possible one or more would have flipped.

That said, it's always a combination of factors so it is still partly to blame even if we assume it wouldn't have done it alone.

You can’t argue against my first point. We literally have the numbers. This isn’t speculative. We measured this.

  • Stein (G): 862,049 votes,

  • Kennedy (I): 756,393

  • Oliver (L): 650,126

  • De La Cruz (): 166,175

  • West (I): 82,664

In no state election would the greens have even come close to moving the results of that race. And if you argue that the green votes actually belong to the Democrats, you’d have to concede that both Kennedy’s and Oliver’s would belong to the Republicans. In which case Trumps victory would have been even more secure.

In the most charitable interpretation, third party votes in 2024 helped Democrats and hurt Trump. If we make some demographic assumptions and treat it like an instant run-off, reassigning third party votes would put Trump even further into the lead. And I don’t think we should make those assumptions, but I’m at least entertaining them.

How does your point in any way refute that voting for Democrats is the most beneficial thing for Palestine? Unless you’re trying to say that by voting for a third party you actually helped democrats win more than you would have by voting for them?? Your point was a non sequitur which is what the person you’re replying to was trying to point out.

you can’t just look at Green party voters

So I responded by broadening the scope and looking at all third party voters. Its a classic trope for apologist Dems to blame third party, and the point is that third party voters were utterly meaningless, and if anything, actually helped Dems in 2024.

Unless you’re trying to say that by voting for a third party you actually helped Democrats win more than you would have by voting for them??

We are not, at all, nor ever have we been, nor ever will we be, talking about what any of us as individuals do. Neither your vote or my vote decided an election. The 6 million votes that Harris left on the table lost the election. You are arguing against a strawman of your own creation, and what you think my personal choice would have been is utterly fucking irrelevant.

What we are discussing is how elections and electorates respond to candidates and the strategies those candidates use. The point is that its now conclusive there was one functional path to Harris winning the election: She needed to oppose the genocide in Gaza. There was no other way for her to win.

Nope. They were talking about an individual vote, their own. Again, you’re changing the subject.

by voting Democrat, I am doing the most beneficial thing I can for Palestine

And the point is: No, they’re not.

The most beneficial thing they could have done would have been to make it clear to the campaign that they were going to lose if they didn’t change their policy on Gaza, because their individual vote doesn’t matter.

Why would the campaign care about their threat to withhold their single useless vote?