Viking_HippieThe kids are alright
The kids are still dumb?
Even if you’re being PC as can be; it was PRE transition dress. She’ll be the 2nd girl to wear it. The first one’s… dead.
SavvyWolf… Unless he transitioned before going to prom? Or maybe considers himself as always having been male before formally transitioning?
She was trying to be kind and inclusive. No need to grumpily look down on her because “uhm actually”.
I was reading it as, “now this dress has the capacity to have had boy cooties on it” which I would have thought, in my limited frame of reference, that would make the dress more gross and perhaps at the very least less desirable for those who are inquiring enough to care about “who has worn this before me”. but I guess if you think about it from the perspective of pulling it off, wearing it well and it fitting their personal taste well for the “first time for that dress”, for whatever that’s worth could be the other interpretation which could reasonably be something I could see someone being excited about
What the hell are boy cooties. Who says that past like 10 years old.
Duh everyone would wash a secondhand item of clothing before wearing it.
You don’t need to phrase yourself as if you’re submitting a dissertation.
wish I could tell you. I think I’m just over analyzing hypothetical cishet-normative scenarios at this point to where I am not able to get into the headspace of someone who would have a problem buying clothes used from someone else based only on the previous owner’s present gender expression or the journey involved in them getting there. It’s a nice win to celebrate, I’m thinking it’s possible the reverse may have happened at some point in time somewhere when some old backwater badass type bozo still agreed to buy a jacket from some one’s wife despite her sharing the story of how her now-wife transitioned and didn’t feel the style anymore