John Carlsen 🇺🇸🇳🇱🇪🇺

RE: https://infosec.exchange/@josephcox/116126373860391542

I've been taught that in the USA there's generally no expectation of privacy in public spaces, meaning that there's a Constitutional right to take pictures and audio/video recordings except in very limited cases (such as near the defense contractor I happened to walk past the other day).

Still, our social norm is to ask permission before including someone in a picture.

For those who insist on recording everything around them, I hope a social norm becomes to call them "glass holes", avoid them, and turn them into social outcasts.

Perhaps with some irony, here's a link to get around a tracking wall for the article about a privacy app called "Nearby Glasses":

https://archive.ph/tVjoU

Feb 25 at 1:35amWeb
Show threadJohn Carlsen 🇺🇸🇳🇱🇪🇺Feb 25

Looks like I need to eat my words:

"You Really Do Have Some Expectation of Privacy in Public"

By Matthew Guariglia and Lisa Femia
September 6, 2024

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/09/you-really-do-have-some-expectation-privacy-public

You Really Do Have Some Expectation of Privacy in Public

When we spend time fighting the growing ubiquity of both public and private surveillance cameras we often hear a familiar refrain: “you don’t have an expectation of privacy in public.” This is not true. In the United States, you do have some expectation of privacy—even in public—and it’s important to stand up and protect that right.

Electronic Frontier Foundation
Show threadDBFeb 25
@johnlogic From what I recall reading, there may be some jurisdictional differences but the general rule is no expectation. Photographers used to have releases for people to sign to address this
Show threadbkFeb 25
@johnlogic
#BrandSuicide for Ray-Ban ?
Show threadSuzanne Aldrich (she/her)Feb 25
@knutson_brain
Ray-Ban, The Official Eye-Spyware for ICE
@johnlogic