@keikioaina
Kind of?
There are some holes in this theory / clarifications that anthropologists from New Zealand and Australia and Hawaii have pointed out. There is a confluence of effects.
(Important caveat: I am not an anthropologist, and I am definitely not a Polynesian anthropologist. "I have read more papers on this than most people!π€‘" does not qualify me as an expert on this topic. The minute someone with a long name shows up with "Professor of anthropology and molecular biology, University of Auckland" replace the next few paragraphs with what they say, because I probably read their paper anywayπ€·πΏββοΈ).
1. The adaptations are: outlier height, bone density, muscle mass, proportion of fast twitch muscle, and barrel chestedness. The genes for the higher bone density, higher muscle mass, and higher proportion of fast twitch fibers found today in Polynesians existed in the underlying Taiwanese population before ocean voyages.
2. The barrel chestedness adaptations occurred over tens of thousands of years, and are similar to adaptations seen around the world for populations that live in very cold environments. So before they even got to Taiwan, the Polynesian population was already fairly tall, had extremely high bone density, had a large proportion of fast twitch muscle fibers, but were not as barrel-chested. They then spent 10,000 or 20,000 years living in very cold conditions. Then they moved to Taiwan.
3. Then when they left Taiwan, there was a brief period of selection due to ocean voyages, but not enough time to significantly select for the underlying genes.
Which is why people that landed on the same Polynesian islands through similar ocean voyage canoe selection, but didn't have the same underlying genes, and weren't cold adapted, are not as big as Tongans, Samoans, Maori, or Hawaiians.