Natasha  đź‡Şđź‡şFeb 20

NewScientist: "Antibodies harvested from the blood of paediatricians are up to 25 times better at protecting against the common respiratory infection RSV than existing antibody therapies, and are now being developed as preventative treatments"

This is both so logical and yet absurdly like a science fiction story ...

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2516079-paediatricians-blood-used-to-make-new-treatments-for-rsv-and-colds/

#Science #Health

Paediatricians’ blood used to make new treatments for RSV and colds

Antibodies harvested from the blood of paediatricians are up to 25 times better at protecting against the common respiratory infection RSV than existing antibody therapies, and are now being developed as preventative treatments

New Scientist
Show threadEveryday.Human DerekFeb 23

@Natasha_Jay @BernieDoesIt

Umm…Is new scientist a reputable source? I’m asking because of the socials listed from the authors and it’s x and linked-in. I don’t know anything about the magizine; authors or publishers.

Thanks Natasha

Show threadBernie Luckily Does It
@EVDHmn @Natasha_Jay Yeah, they're reputable. I've heard of them before. They do good work.
Feb 23 at 11:33pmWeb
Show threadEveryday.Human DerekFeb 24

@BernieDoesIt @Natasha_Jay
I have too, the amount of Bullshit lately that I see or things taken out of context.

For instance the better you get at picking up on Bullshit your false positives Go up.

I may have turned a bit 🤔skeptical of anything lately that is mainstream, mostly because it’s owned or published or touched by slaves who are owned or are Rich.

Like I may respect a Story, for 1.its Creative expression or

2.I want to know how many ways they measured the accuracy.