ZerushFeb 21

AI advice

https://lemmy.ml/post/43493940

Show threadthedeadwalking4242Feb 21

Just a heads up for anyone who may use this in an argument. I just tested on several models and the generated response accounted for the logical fallacy. Unfortunately it isn’t real.

( Funny non-the less )

Show threadAxolotl
Tested on GPT-5 mini and it’e real tho?
Feb 21 at 1:26pmWeb
Show threadthedeadwalking4242Feb 21

I used paid models which will be the only ones the AI bros will care about. Even they kinda know not to glaze the free models. So not surprising

( I have to have the paid models for work, my lead developer is a AI nut )

Show threadVincentComfyFeb 21
Gemini’s responses were surprisingly humorous
Show threadEpheraFeb 21

Man, I really hate how much they waffle. The only valid response is “You have to drive, because you need your car at the car wash in order to wash it”.

I don’t need an explanation what kind of problem it is, nor a breakdown of the options. I don’t need a bulletpoint list of arguments. I don’t need pros and cons. And I definitely don’t need a verdict.

Show threadAxolotlFeb 21
Yeaaah they waffle a lot, i hate that
Show threadLordKitsunaFeb 23
You can actually fix this in the settings there’s an option for permanent prompt tunings and you can add things like “focus on concise answers” or my favorite " i don’t need to be glazed , I don’t need to be told that it’s an insightful question or reaches the heart of the matter. Just focus on answering the question"
Show threadJakeroxsFeb 21
I’ve found some success in ussing system prompts or similar to ignore explaining things lol
Show threadTropicalDingdongFeb 21
It’s the illusion of reason
Show threadAlfalFaFailFeb 21

I’ll also accept sarcasm.

“Unless you’ve successfully trained your car to follow you like a loyal golden retriever, you’re probably going to have to drive.”

Show threadXavienthFeb 21
They are trained to yap because it gives them a higher likelihood of giving the correct answer. If they don’t go on and on in user presented text, it at least does it in hidden text.
Show threadAlfalFaFailFeb 21
That gemini response is legitimately hilarious.
Show threadAxolotlFeb 21
Yeah, he yapped a lot for no reason but at least it make you giggle a little
Show threadu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)Feb 22
Yeah, Gemini is… interesting. It said it’s a “one-way route” for the human.
Show threadtroglodytisFeb 21
Gemini got joke, but why does it think walking emits zero carbons? Humans are carbon emitters, more so with exercise. Hell, I farted while giggling at its humor. Much less carbon than the car? Yep. Zero? Nope
Show threadxthexderFeb 21
Bold of Gemini to imply any sort of liability for what it says. Google’s lawyers really don’t want that to be the case.
Show threadSpeziFeb 22

Tried it in GPT 5.2 (although in German) and it also says, that walking is better.

It also made a completely illogical sentence at the third point with two words in lowercase that should be uppercase.