3) BoP is collecting and distributing funds (JP Morgan playing as banker) but this must be in violation of Know-Your-Customer laws since BoP *doesn't exist*. It is a transnational mafia backed only by the executive power of its members.

4) Since BoP doesn't exist, USPTO is illegally holding its trademarks on its behalf, violating the Lanham Act, which requires that holders intend to use marks in commerce.

This thing needs to be challenged legally and practically. If it is not stopped it will quickly evolve into a world takeover mechanism, and indeed it is already usurping US sovereignty as well as sovereignty in Gaza and of participant countries.

Seriously, this is no joke and intervention is necessary NOW. The illegal trademarks are one pathway in. There are others. But whatever you do don't brush this off as one of Trump's follies. It's anything but.

@davetroy I am glad you posted this. I was just trying to explain this to a colleague as a gut feeling I had, and relating it to SCOTUS' tariff decision (related due to ensuing lawlessness). You have put better words and sense to my gut feelings.

There is only one reason to do things in Trumplandia. To benefit Trump.

@ashtime
ICC is toothless against US hegemony since the whole of Europe, including the ICC runs on US-owned payments systems.

The US can just blacklist the ICC and payments providers/banks will jettison them faster than you can blink, as has already happened to judges working to prosecute Netanyahu's regime.

@Brad_Rosenheim @davetroy

@zelgaav
Sure "funds will flow" from one bank to another, except you will need to personally go to your bank and retrieve cash directly from them, because none of your online payments/ATM cards will work.

And while you can use some national payments systems as long as they have wide enough adoption, there are no international payments systems that span the whole of the EU, much less anywhere else in the world.

@ashtime @Brad_Rosenheim @davetroy