LR
wife has now to prove in court to a commercial infringer that her work is not ai generated. what a time to be alive.
Feb 20 at 9:17amWeb
Show threadaevaFeb 20
@lritter jesus fucking christ
Show threadmmbyFeb 20
@lritter fucking hell. wtfff.
Show threadLRFeb 20
@mmby and a german court no less.
Show threadConchoidFeb 20
@lritter draw them a middle finger onsite
Show threadConchoidFeb 20
@lritter (another great paragraph of Germany respecting their artists)
Show threadratrogue @ Rat KingFeb 20
@lritter dafuq
Show threadFabian GiesenFeb 20
@lritter wat
Show threadhalcy​ Feb 20

@lritter oh, we've moved to Aicussations as a *legal maneuver* now, that's uh, impressive

and the court is just with this? like the infringer just goes "it's OBVIOUSLY ai" and that's... enough?

Show threadLRFeb 20
@halcy i can't comment in public on what i think about the judge.
Show threadhalcy​ Feb 20

@lritter seufz

viel erfolg und/oder glück

Show threadKaiFeb 20
@lritter Alter...! Viel Erfolg!
Show threadFelix B. OhmannFeb 20
@lritter ouch. good luck!
Show threadBuridan's procrastinator ⁂Feb 20
@lritter good luck 🍀
Show threadRAT QUEEN 🧹⚔️Mops & MobsFeb 20
@lritter Wait, what?! This is ridiculous - why?
Show threadLRFeb 20
@ratqueen accused says they don't need to pay because it's ai. so now she has to demonstrate that it is not.
Show threadRAT QUEEN 🧹⚔️Mops & MobsFeb 20
@lritter So weird ... I mean, they've seen her work before, right? Sucks. Always thought her work looks quite genuine and different from what is out there....
Show threadLRFeb 20

@ratqueen she's not happy that she has to reveal work secrets in front of a court that might make their way to the internet and be used as fake proof by opponents in future disputes (there's the other category of infringers who brazenly claim they painted the image).

imo it should suffice that she swears an oath on it + shows her long history of previous works, and then it is up to the accused to demonstrate how an AI could have produced this work but legal procedures are not rational.

Show threadRAT QUEEN 🧹⚔️Mops & MobsFeb 20
@lritter Can't she just show her work from before 2022/2023? before we got generators?
Show threadLRFeb 20
@ratqueen the work is from before that time even. but what does that say for any works made after this time? what does it even mean then that "german works of art are copyrighted by default" in this kind of world
Show threadRAT QUEEN 🧹⚔️Mops & MobsFeb 20
@lritter It sucks when you achieved to have a popular, very likeable high contrast style - that gets also emulated by AI quite often. But that's not her fault.
Reading a lot threads about "exposing" artists on Bsky that allegedly used AI...but actually didn't. It's a mess.
Show threadkrigFeb 20
@lritter @ratqueen So fucked up!
Show threadCM ThiedeFeb 20
@lritter It's so much easier to make money off of artists than it is for artists to make money off their work.
Show threadRobert DresdenFeb 20
@lritter Just doing a large painting using the infringers blood is t going to work?
Show threadLRFeb 20
@acetylcholin they should rather reimburse her. that would help us more.