They are talking to everyone. This is Mastodon - if you don't like a poster, don't follow, or block and move on.
Background for the confused: some folks at Adafruit have found utility in using AI for circuit board layouts. This isn't unreasonable - verifiable technical tasks evade some of the flaws in current AI output. Some other folks are offended by this. They should shop elsewhere if it's that important to them. What they shouldn't do is try to drag *anyone* for it, especially on Mastodon. On mastodon, you only see content of people you follow or that people you follow boosted. If you don't like that content - block or unfollow, please. Evangelists of any stripe will have a hard time here by design. We block early and often.
Yes, AI has some ugly baggage. But like almost everything in this world, it is not wholly evil or pure - it's just tech, and the moral value comes from how it's created and used, it isn't inherent. My personal take is that the technology is far less an issue than the reality of how it was trained and how the businesses selling it are affecting the economy, but doing that justice is a rant that also probably doesn't belong here.
If this upsets anyone, block me. Please.
I both get it and agree.
But Adafruit was unfairly dragged recently by a mistaken association with another vendor and got dogpiled on; the original poster deleted their post, but the mob is still riled.
If you dislike AI and the effects it has on our society - I mostly agree. But the problem is less the users, and more the AI companies who are doing all sorts of illegal and unethical shit. They are the correct targets of our collective ire, not the end users. I have a feeling most AI end-users will get burned quickly enough without people yelling at them online TBH - the viable use-cases are far more narrow than the evangelists would have us believe.
@tbortels @nik @adafruit I think the mob is mostly riled because of the idiotic way in which Adafruit decided to response to the initial mistake.
Besides that I think we agree. My problem with AI is mainly that it's mostly controlled by a few assholes. With the insane resource requirements being a close second.
@adafruit @nik @[email protected]
And if that bothered anyone reading this: yes, please block me. Do it now. You don't need me in your life.
No, really. Your feed in mastodon is yours to curate. Nobody is doing it for you - and that's a good thing. If you block me, my response is "good for you - make the world you want to live in."
I'm interested in talking and sharing. I'm not looking to fight, at least not here.
Proprietary software is *by definition* evil. AI, especially the ones from Big Tech, are based on such evil proprietary software that infringes on the user's freedom, privacy and destroys our environment.
The least you can do, if you guys truly represent indie hacker community in any sense, is to reject it categorically. And if you can't rejct it, just don't put yourself on that ethical ground. Say it clearly that you have given up. Also, stop blaming Mastodon's people. This is a place where we reject bad things that are prevalent in the world and mainstream industry. A place where we respect freedom. If somehow people complaining about that is a problem, then it is rather you who should be reconsidering whether you belong on Mastodon or over something like X where I'm sure you'll find many such people who can help you with AI.
Indeed - the case where (1) the training material is published with the intent of sharing/teaching, and (2) the result is fairly easily tested for correctness is the one real, compelling use-case for current AI.
A hallucinated circuit should quickly be identified by the blue smoke and flame.